The BP commercial utilizes many different types of arguments. Our textbook states, “Perhaps the essential argument in any case is the writer’s assertion that a problem exists.” The woman representing the BP Community Outreach says, “BP has taken full responsibility for the clean up in the gulf and that includes keeping you informed.” Right off the bat, she is admitting there is a serious problem.
She begins with an informative argument by simply telling the audience about her job and how she (along with the outreach program) is helping others affected by the oil spill. She says she listens to the shrimpers, fishermen, hotel and restaurant workers., and finds ways to help which means working with communities. By informing, whether her intentions are to persuade or not, she automatically gets the audience interested in the topic.
She then proceeds to talk numbers, saying, “We have 19 centers in 4 states. We've made over 120,000 claims payments, more than 375 million dollars. We’ve committed 20 billion dollars to an independent claims fund to cover lost income until people impacted can get back to work.” By discussing these statistics, she is bringing up the outreach program’s success in the past, which leads the audience to believe that this program will continue to succeed. This is an example of an argument about the past and future. The book says that what has happened in the past influences the future and this is clearly what the commercial is aiming at.
Additionally, this part of the commercial appeals to the logos. The facts, stated very simply, the audience will use inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning by thinking, “If the outreach program has been this effective thus far, the numbers will only increase and they will continue to make a positive impact.”
In various parts of the commercial, the camera is off and the audience sees the words such as, “Objective: Restore the Environment” or “Making this Right: Restoring Gulf Communities.” I believe that this is an example of an invitational argument. These signs aren’t necessarily trying to win over somebody or persuade, (they are informing) but moreover, they are inviting the audience to explore more about this topic.
When she mentions that she deals with communities, we see her in various situations interacting with others. She seems very concerned and interested in these people. This part of the commercial appeals to the emotional appeal. When the audience sees her being sympathetic, holding hands, listening, etc., they probably thinking something like, “What a nice woman, this program is obviously well intentioned.” Later in the commercial she says, “I was born in new Orleans, my family still lives here.” This makes an appeal to the pathos (emotional) and the ethos (ethical). By saying that, she seems more credible and also more like a normal, everyday person instead of an important person on a commercial.
I feel that the commercial was somewhat effective. It informed that the outreach program is doing everything it can do to help people. For me, the most compelling parts were when there would be clips of her helping others, appealing to the pathos. Everybody has emotions, so when a commercial or advertisement aims at tugging at your heart strings they are going to get results most of the time.